Sunday, February 24, 2013

"Men" Analysis


In the poem “Men”, Maya Angelou uses varying sentence lengths and imagery to show how bad experience with love may alter a person’s perspective forever, but some still choose to return to similar experiences and try again. At both the beginning and end of the poem, Angelou uses curtains as a symbol for innocence and safety. She begins by saying “When I was young, I used to/ Watch behind the curtains”, but eventually curiosity draws her out from behind the curtains into the not-so-innocent world. Once she does so, the sentence structure of the poem changes from long, multi-line sentences to short sentences, only 3-5 words each. “Then/ they tighten up. Just a little. The/ First squeeze is nice. A quick hug/ Soft into your defenselessness. A little/ more. The hurt begins” (Angelou). The short sentences give the poem a flashback-like feeling, where the speaker only reveals certain quick images, leaving the rest for the reader to infer on their own, as if the speaker’s afraid or ashamed to speak of what happened. It also causes the pace to speed up, inducing a more panicked voice. The use of metaphors, such as the egg, also help give the reader a better picture of what Angelou is trying to get across; the women are innocent and fragile, and while men are big and strong, the women are easily broken. She also uses the simile “your mind pops, exploding fiercely, briefly/ Like the head of a kitchen match” (Angelou). Once again, even though the woman is portrayed as something less innocent now, she’s still weak, as kitchen matches aren’t extremely dangerous or explosive. Finally, the speaker returns to the curtain metaphor, saying that this time she’ll “simply/ stand and watch/ maybe” (Angelou). The final word, “maybe”, ends the poem with somewhat of a contradiction; the entire poem she’d been speaking of how awful men were and how she’d never go back, but the slight hint that she would go back shows her uncertainty over the whole experience.
            In “Nights at the Circus”, by Angela Carter, this same uncertainty is seen through Fevvers’ painful past with men. Fevvers grew up in Ma Nelson's house, which was "a wholly female world within" (Carter 38). Like the speaker in the poem, innitially, Fevvers' only experience with men was from "behind the curtains" (Angelou) of the house, but as Fevvers grows older she eventually becomes more exposed to the world of men through Madame Schreck and joining the Colonel's circus. "And the curtains have never been opened in all my memory of the place, nor could a single one of the cother girls recall when those curtains had last been opened, either. . . So we threw open the curtains" (Carter 49). This point in the novel is where Fevvers finally has to leave behind her childhood, though she takes Ma Nelson's sword with her wherever she goes as a sense of security.
            "Wrench out a/ Smile that slides around the fear" (Angelou) is describing when women let their guard down, then the man moves in to hurt them, but they play innocent at first and pretend to not know what's going on before they get hurt. This is like Fevvers' encounter with the Grand Duke, when she feels uneasy around him, but doesn't leave. "the hairs on her nape rose and the Grand Duke turned to her a satisfied smile, as if, all along, he intended her to be afraid of him. For the first time in her life, she refused champagne" (Carter 188). While the Duke is trying to hold power over her, Fevvers tries to not let him win, but she can't overcome his strength. " when the Grand Duke's arms tightened around her, she realized he was a man of quite exceptional physical strength, sufficient to pin even her to the ground. . . flushed out Nelson's sword from its hiding place in her corset" (Carter 191). His destruction of her sword, the one item that makes her feel secure, finally gives him complete power over her. "Now she was defenseless. She could have wept" (Carter 191). From this point on in the novel, Fevvers, like the speaker in the poem, is transformed. She's uncertain as to who she is, but she vows that she's learned her lesson. "But this time, I will simply/ Stand and watch./ Maybe" (Angelou). The "maybe" at the very end, however, addresses uncertainty towards going back to men. Fevvers and the speaker both relapse slightly after their bad experiences, and contemplate perhaps trying at love again, though they're uncertain. "Can you love? he demanded of her in a great, rhapsodic rush as she rose up out of her curtsey. When she heard that, her heart lifted and sang" (Carter 291).

3 comments:

  1. I really thought it was odd the metaphors of the poem as they are incredibly negative as they are all directed at males. I wonder how autobiographical the piece is and if Maya Angelou continually had issues with men? Her take on the affections of men is very different compared to how love is usually portrayed in literature

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really thought it was odd that all of the metaphors of the poem were incredibly negative and they are all directed at males. I wonder how autobiographical the piece is and if Maya Angelou continually had issues with men? Her take on the affections of men is very different compared to how love is usually portrayed in literature; Maya seems to be disillusioned by love, most likely due to her own experiences in the realm. However she does still garner hope for love, as you pointed out, in the final line of the poem.

    This hope seems to define the perspective of Maya Angelou, a belief that there is a better man than the last one. Yet, this hope seems to be portrayed as childish, especially when compared to the descriptions of a man loving a woman. The imagery brings to mind pain and suffering with little hope for good. Personally, I believe that Angelou wrote the poem out of pure spite for men due to the actions of one. It is similar to that in which a child connects pain with doctors because doctors perform shots or use stitches.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Angela Carter’s use of metaphor and symbolism both illuminate and help to express how she feels about feministic ideas. As you explained the Curtains I agree seem to show how when a girl is innocent she is said to be behind the curtains then curiosity takes over and they become more and more worldly. Same as the Egg, it is fragile and can break if it’s not protected, just like a little girl. The theme of the loss of innocence, and talking control of one’s self is highlighted throughout your presentation. When you talked about how the author resembles the woman character in the novel it is clear that the author had ideas about woman’s rights and independence and wanted to share them throughout her writing.
    You explained how the use of language and devices of Maya Angelou contributed to the ideas of women’s freedom; therefore it was able to connect with Angela Carter’s ideas. I think that starting with the author’s background was helpful so that I was able to see the connection between both the novels and her life, as well as how they connected back to the poetry. In her life you said she got married then realized she wanted to find independence so she divorced her husband and once she was able to be independent she got remarried for love and no longer for political reasons. Previously, it seemed as though she was marrying because she didn’t have a say in what was happening in the world, and she figured she might as well have a husband who did. Her ability to break away was a good element of foreshadow within her life and her books as well; which you connected and it was a great connecting point that helped me understand. In the poetry, I think you did a good job of making a full circle from how the theme’s connected to the language of each and back to the themes; it kept it organized and easy to follow so that I was able to keep up with your thoughts.

    ReplyDelete